CIPP-E Valid Test & CIPP-E Cert Material & CIPP-E Sure Pass Exam

DOWNLOAD the newest TestValid CIPP-E PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1h-F3OiT9C0TaJYFNSultEOuKleHrkx_x

We believe that every customer pays most attention to quality when he is shopping. Only high-quality goods can meet the needs of every customer better. And our CIPP-E training quiz has such high quality, because its hit rate of test questions is extremely high. Perhaps you will find in the examination that a lot of questions you have seen many times in our CIPP-E Real Exam. And you will find our CIPP-E practice questions are so popular that a lot of our candidates have bought them.

IAPP CIPP-E (Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe) exam is a globally recognized certification program that validates an individual's knowledge and expertise in the field of privacy and data protection within the European Union. Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification is designed for individuals who work with or handle personal data, including privacy professionals, legal advisors, data protection officers, and information security professionals. The CIPP-E Exam is a comprehensive test that covers the essential principles and practices of privacy and data protection in the European context.

>> Interactive CIPP-E Questions <<

CIPP-E Test Dates - CIPP-E Exams Torrent

These Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) (CIPP-E) practice exams contain all the CIPP-E questions that clearly and completely elaborate on the difficulties and hurdles you will face in the final Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) (CIPP-E) exam. Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) (CIPP-E) practice test is customizable so that you can change the timings of each session. TestValid desktop IAPP CIPP-E Practice Test questions software is only compatible with windows and easy to use for everyone.

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) Sample Questions (Q290-Q295):

NEW QUESTION # 290
An unforeseen power outage results in company Z's lack of access to customer data for six hours. According to article 32 of the GDPR, this is considered a breach. Based on the WP 29's February, 2018 guidance, company Z should do which of the following?

A. Notify affected individuals that their data was unavailable for a period of time.
B. Notify the supervisory authority about the loss of availability
C. Document the loss of availability to demonstrate accountability
D. Conduct a thorough audit of all security systems

Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 291
Assuming that the "without undue delay" provision is followed, what is the time limit for complying with a data access request?

A. Within 40 days of receipt
B. Within one month of receipt, which may be extended by an additional two months
C. Within one month of receipt, which may be extended by up to an additional month
D. Within 40 days of receipt, which may be extended by up to 40 additional days

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to the GDPR, data controllers must respond to a data access request (also known as a subject access request or SAR) without undue delay and in any event within one month of receipt of the request. This time limit can be extended by a further two months if the request is complex or if the controller receives a number of requests from the same individual. However, the controller must still inform the individual within one month of receipt of the request and explain why the extension is necessary. The time limit is calculated from the day after the request is received (whether it is a working day or not) until the corresponding calendar date in the next month. If there is no corresponding calendar date, the deadline is the last day of the next month. If the deadline falls on a weekend or public holiday, the response must be provided on the next working day. Reference:
GDPR, Article 12(3)
ICO, Right of access1
ICO, Time limits for responding to data protection rights requests2

NEW QUESTION # 292
Pursuant to Article 17 and EDPB Guidelines S'2019 on RTBF criteria in search engines cases, all of the following would be valid grounds for data subject delisting requests EXCEPT?

A. The processing s necessary for exercising the right of freedom of expression and information
B. The personal dale has been collected in relation to the offer of Information society services (ISS) to a child.
C. The personal data is no longer necessary in relation to the search engine provider's processing
D. The data subject withdraws consent and there is no other legal basis for the processing.

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to Article 17 of the GDPR, the data subject has the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay and the controller has the obligation to erase personal data without undue delay where one of the following grounds applies: (a) the personal data are no longer necessary in relation to the purposes for which they were collected or otherwise processed; (b) the data subject withdraws consent on which the processing is based and where there is no other legal ground for the processing; the data subject objects to the processing pursuant to Article 21(1) and there are no overriding legitimate grounds for the processing, or the data subject objects to the processing pursuant to Article 21(2); (d) the personal data have been unlawfully processed; (e) the personal data have to be erased for compliance with a legal obligation in Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject; (f) the personal data have been collected in relation to the offer of information society services referred to in Article 8(1).
However, Article 17(3) provides that the right to erasure does not apply to the extent that processing is necessary for exercising the right of freedom of expression and information. Therefore, this would not be a valid ground for data subject delisting requests. References:
Article 17 of the GDPR
EDPB Guidelines 5/2019 on the criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR (part 1)

NEW QUESTION # 293
Which aspect of processing does the GDPR allow processors to determine for themselves?

A. The question of whether the controller needs to be informed about the substitution of another processor carrying out specific processing activities on behalf of the controller.
B. Their own type of hardware or software and the specific security measures for the processing.
C. Their own purposes for the processing, if such purposes are compatible with those for which the personal data were initially collected.
D. The parameters of their marketing campaigns using personal data relating to the controller's customers.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The GDPR defines processors as entities that process personal data on behalf of controllers, typically under a contract or other legal act that sets out the subject matter, duration, nature, purpose, type and categories of personal data, and the obligations and rights of the controller. Processors must act only on the documented instructions of the controller, unless required by law to act otherwise. Processors must also comply with the GDPR's requirements regarding the security, confidentiality, transfer, sub-processing, notification, assistance, cooperation, and documentation of the personal data processing.
However, the GDPR does not prescribe the exact technical and organisational measures that processors must implement to ensure the security of the personal data processing. Instead, the GDPR requires that processors take into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation, the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing, and the risks for the rights and freedoms of data subjects. Therefore, processors have some discretion to determine their own type of hardware or software and the specific security measures for the processing, as long as they provide a level of security appropriate to the risk and comply with the controller's instructions. Processors may also adhere to approved codes of conduct or certification mechanisms to demonstrate their compliance with the GDPR's security requirements.
The other options listed in the question are not aspects of processing that the GDPR allows processors to determine for themselves. According to the GDPR:
Processors must inform the controller of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other processors, and give the controller the opportunity to object to such changes. Processors must also impose the same data protection obligations on any sub-processors as those agreed with the controller.
Processors must not process the personal data for their own purposes, unless they have a legal basis to do so and inform the data subjects accordingly. Processors must only process the personal data for the purposes determined by the controller, and in accordance with the controller's instructions.
Processors must not use the personal data relating to the controller's customers for their own marketing campaigns, unless they have obtained the consent of the data subjects or have another legitimate interest to do so. Processors must respect the data subjects' rights to object to direct marketing and to withdraw their consent at any time.
References:
GDPR, Articles 4, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43.
EDPB Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR, pages 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25, 26, 27 and 28.

NEW QUESTION # 294
Which of the following countries will continue to enjoy adequacy status under the GDPR, pending any future European Commission decision to the contrary?

A. Greece
B. Australia
C. Norway
D. Switzerland

Answer: D

Explanation:
Adequacy is a term that the EU uses to describe other countries, territories, sectors or international organisations that it deems to provide an 'essentially equivalent' level of data protection to that which exists within the EU. An adequacy decision is a formal decision made by the EU which recognises that another country, territory, sector or international organisation provides an equivalent level of protection for personal data as the EU does. The effect of such a decision is that personal data can flow from the EU (and Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland) to that third country without any further safeguard being necessary12.
The European Commission has so far recognised Andorra, Argentina, Canada (commercial organisations), Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Israel, Isle of Man, Japan, Jersey, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, the United Kingdom under the GDPR and the LED, the United States (commercial organisations participating in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework) and Uruguay as providing adequate protection13. On 28 June 2021, the EU Commission published two adequacy decisions in respect of the UK: one for transfers under the EU GDPR; and the other for transfers under the Law Enforcement Directive (LED)2. These decisions contain the European Commission's detailed assessment of the UK's laws and systems for protecting personal data, as well as the legislation designating the UK as adequate. Both adequacy decisions are expected to last until 27 June 20252.
Among the four options given, only Switzerland has been granted an adequacy decision by the EU, which means that it will continue to enjoy adequacy status under the GDPR, pending any future European Commission decision to the contrary. Greece is a member state of the EU, so it does not need an adequacy decision to receive personal data from the EU. Norway is a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), which also includes Iceland and Liechtenstein, and has incorporated the GDPR into its national law, so it also does not need an adequacy decision. Australia has not been recognised as adequate by the EU, so transfers of personal data from the EU to Australia require appropriate safeguards or derogations13. Therefore, the correct answer is D. Switzerland. References:
https://pages.iapp.org/Free-Study-Guides_CIPPE-PPC-EU.htmlhttps://data-privacy-office.eu/courses/cipp-e- official-training-course/ Reference: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection/ adequacy-decisions_en

NEW QUESTION # 295
......

TestValid is a reliable platform to provide candidates with effective study braindumps that have been praised by all users. For find a better job, so many candidate study hard to prepare the Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E), it is not an easy thing for most people to pass the CIPP-E Exam, therefore, our website can provide you with efficient and convenience learning platform, so that you can obtain as many certificates as possible in the shortest time.

CIPP-E Test Dates: https://www.testvalid.com/CIPP-E-exam-collection.html

BONUS!!! Download part of TestValid CIPP-E dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1h-F3OiT9C0TaJYFNSultEOuKleHrkx_x

Will Fox Will Fox

Biography

CIPP-E Valid Test & CIPP-E Cert Material & CIPP-E Sure Pass Exam

CIPP-E Test Dates - CIPP-E Exams Torrent

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) Sample Questions (Q290-Q295):

Courses

Quick Links

Contact