Copyright © 2023 Russell College Design By Nubevest.
試験準備のための学習資料を見つけている場合、当社の資料は検索を終了します。私たちのCSP-Assessor試験トレントは、あなたが期待できない高品質を持っています。 CSP-Assessorトレントは時間を大幅に節約するのに役立ち、あなたがやりたいことをする自由時間が増えると思います。私たちのCSP-Assessorテスト問題集の使用について後悔がないことを保証できます。アクションの時間が来たら、思考を止めて、入って、私たちのCSP-Assessor試験トレントを試してください。 CSP-Assessor試験に合格し、短時間で証明書を取得する必要があります。
難しいIT認証試験に受かることを選んだら、頑張って準備すべきです。GoShikenのSwiftのCSP-Assessor試験トレーニング資料はIT認証試験に受かる最高の資料で、手に入れたら成功への鍵を持つようになります。GoShikenのSwiftのCSP-Assessor試験トレーニング資料は信頼できるもので、１００パーセントの合格率を保証します。
合格できるSwift Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification試験はいくつありますか？ それらをすべて試してみてください！ GoShikenは、Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification コーススペシャリストが開発した実際のSwift CSP-Assessorの回答を含むSwift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification CSP-Assessor試験問題への完全なアクセス権をUnlimited Access Planに提示します。 Swift Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certificationテストに合格できるだけでなく、さらに良くなります！ また、すべての試験の質問と回答にアクセスして、合計1800以上の試験に合格することもできます。
質問 # 57
The cluster of VPN boxes is also called managed-customer premises equipment (M-CPE).
正解：A
解説：
This question addresses the terminology related to VPN boxes in the Swift environment and their association with managed-customer premises equipment (M-CPE). Let's verify this based on Swift CSP documentation.
Step 1: Understand VPN Boxes and M-CPE in Swift Context
In the Swift ecosystem, VPN boxes are typically part of the connectivity infrastructure used to establish secure tunnels (e.g., Network Transport Layer Security - NTLS) for communication with the Swift network.
The term "managed-customer premises equipment (M-CPE)" generally refers to hardware or devices managed by a service provider or third party on the customer's premises, often in telecommunications or IT contexts. TheSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024and related technical documentation provide insights into Swift's infrastructure terminology.
Step 2: Analyze the Statement
The statement claims that the "cluster of VPN boxes is also called managed-customer premises equipment (M- CPE)." We need to determine if this is an official or recognized designation within the Swift CSP.
Step 3: Evaluate Against Swift CSP Guidelines
* TheSwift Alliance Gateway Technical DocumentationandSwift Security Best Practicesdescribe VPN boxes (or similar connectivity devices) as part of the SwiftNet Link (SNL) infrastructure, often deployed at the user's premises to secure communications. These devices are typically managed by the Swift user or a designated service provider, depending on the architecture (e.g., A2 or A4).
* The term "M-CPE" is not specifically defined or used in Swift CSP documentation (e.g.,CSCF v2024, Swift User Handbook, orSwift Network Security Guidelines). Instead, Swift refers to such equipment as part of the "customer premises equipment (CPE)" when managed by the user, or as "managed services" when outsourced to a provider. However, "M-CPE" as a specific term for a cluster of VPN boxes is not corroborated.
* In some IT contexts outside Swift, M-CPE might imply managed equipment, but Swift's documentation does not adopt this terminology for VPN clusters, which are considered part of the broader connectivity infrastructure.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The statement isFALSEbecause theCSCF v2024and related Swift documentation do not use "managed- customer premises equipment (M-CPE)" as a term for a cluster of VPN boxes. The correct terminology aligns with "customer premises equipment" or "managed connectivity devices," depending on the setup, but not specifically M-CPE.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 1.1: Swift Environment Protection.
* Swift Alliance Gateway Technical Documentation, Section: Connectivity Infrastructure.
* Swift Security Best Practices, Section: Network Security Devices.
質問 # 58
Alliance Lite2 only supports the sending and receiving of FIN messages.
正解：A
解説：
This question examines the messaging capabilities of Alliance Lite2 under the Swift Customer Security Programme (CSP).
Step 1: Understand Alliance Lite2
Alliance Lite2 is a lightweight Swift solution designed for smaller financial institutions, providing access to Swift messaging services. Its capabilities are detailed in theSwift Alliance Lite2 User Guideand referenced in theCSCF v2024context.
Step 2: Analyze the Statement
The statement claims that Alliance Lite2 "only supports the sending and receiving of FIN messages." FIN messages are part of the FIN service for payment transactions, but Alliance Lite2's scope extends beyond this.
Step 3: Evaluate Against Swift Guidelines
* TheSwift Alliance Lite2 User Guidespecifies that Alliance Lite2 supports multiple message types, including:
* FIN messages(e.g., MT103 for payments).
* FileAct(for file transfers).
* InterAct(for real-time messaging).
* TheCSCF v2024does not restrict Alliance Lite2 to FIN messages; it applies security controls to all supported services. TheSwift CSP FAQconfirms that Alliance Lite2 users must comply with controls for all active services, not just FIN.
* Thus, the statement that it "only supports" FIN messages is false, as it also supports FileAct and InterAct.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The answer isB, as Alliance Lite2 supports more than just FIN messages, including FileAct and InterAct, per theSwift Alliance Lite2 User GuideandCSCF v2024.
References
* Swift Alliance Lite2 User Guide, Section: Supported Services.
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 1.1: Swift Environment Protection.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Alliance Lite2 Scope.
質問 # 59
What must a Swift user implement to comply with a CSCF security control?
正解：B
解説：
This question addresses the implementation requirements for CSCF security controls.
Step 1: Understand CSCF Compliance
TheCSCF v2024emphasizes achieving control objectives and mitigating risk drivers for in-scope components, allowing flexibility in implementation, as perControl Objectives Overview.
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
* A. A solution that maps the implementation guidelines described for a controls in scope componentsWhile implementation guidelines exist, strict adherence is not mandatory. TheCSCF v2024 allows custom solutions if they meet objectives.Conclusion: Incorrect.
* B. A solution that meets the control objectives and addresses the risk drivers for the in scope componentsTheCSCF v2024andSwift CSP FAQrequire solutions to align with control objectives (e.g., security, detection) and mitigate identified risks, offering flexibility in approach.Conclusion: Correct.
Step 3: Conclusion and Verification
The correct answer isB, as theCSCF v2024prioritizes meeting objectives and addressing risks over rigid guideline mapping.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Section: Control Objectives.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Implementation Flexibility.
質問 # 60
What is the purpose of a SWIFT HSM? (Select the correct answer)
*Connectivity
*Generic
*Products Cloud
*Products OnPrem
*Security
正解：D
解説：
A Hardware Security Module (HSM) in the SWIFT context is a physical or virtual device used to manage cryptographic keys and perform security operations. Its purpose is critical to ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of SWIFT transactions. Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: To encrypt the database of the messaging interface
This is incorrect. While HSMs can perform encryption, their primary role in the SWIFT ecosystem is not to encrypt databases of messaging interfaces (e.g., Alliance Access). Database encryption is typically handled by the institution's own security measures or software, not the HSM. The CSCF focuses on HSMs for key management and message security, not database-level encryption (e.g., Control "1.1 SWIFT Environment Protection").
*Option B: To store PKI certificates
This is correct. The SWIFT HSM is used to securely store and manage Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificates, which are essential for authentication, message signing, and encryption within the SWIFT network. SWIFT uses PKI for role-based access control and to secure communications over SWIFTNet. The HSM ensures that these certificates are protected against unauthorized access and tampering, aligning with CSCF Control "1.3 Cryptographic Failover." For example, in Alliance Gateway setups, the HSM stores SWIFTNet PKI certificates used for secure message transmission.
*Option C: To connect to the SWIFT Secure IP Network (SIPN)
This is incorrect. Connection to the SIPN is managed by components like SwiftNet Link (SNL) and VPN boxes, not the HSM. The HSM's role is security-focused, handling cryptographic operations, not network connectivity. CSCF Control "1.1" specifies that connectivity is achieved through network components, while the HSM supports security within that environment.
*Option D: To format the FIN MT messages
This is incorrect. Message formatting (e.g., creating FIN MT messages like MT103) is handled by messaging interfaces like Alliance Access or Alliance Gateway, not the HSM. The HSM's function is limited to cryptographic tasks, such as signing and verifying messages after they are formatted, as per CSCF Control
"2.1 Internal Data Transmission Security."
Summary of Correct answer:
The primary purpose of a SWIFT HSM is to store PKI certificates, ensuring secure cryptographic operations for SWIFT transactions.
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024: Control 1.3 mandates the use of HSMs for cryptographic failover and certificate management.
*SWIFT Security Guidelines: HSMs are described as key management devices for PKI certificates in SWIFTNet communications.
*Alliance Gateway Documentation: Details the HSM's role in storing and managing PKI certificates for secure message processing.
質問 # 61
A SWIFT user has had part of controls assessed by their internal audit department, and the other remaining controls using an external assessor company. Is this acceptable? (Select the correct answer)
*Swift Customer Security Controls Policy
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025
*Independent Assessment Framework
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines
*Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree
*CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls
*Assessment template for Advisory controls
*CSCF Assessment Completion Letter
*Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template
正解：A
解説：
The SWIFT CSP requires a consistent and independent assessment process, as specified in the "Independent Assessment Framework" and "Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines." Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: Yes, a SWIFT user can combine multiple assessment types (internal and external assessment) as long as all controls are covered This is incorrect. The CSP mandates that the assessment be conducted by a single, independent assessor or firm to ensure uniformity and objectivity. Mixing internal audits (which lack independence) with external assessments does not meet the requirement, as per the "Independent Assessment Framework."
*Option B: No, because the SWIFT user cannot be sure the same approach and quality will be delivered This is incorrect as the primary reason. While consistency is a concern, the main issue is the lack of independence, not just quality variation.
*Option C: Yes, but only if there is a signed agreement between all involved assessors This is incorrect. A signed agreement does not resolve the CSP's requirement for a single independent assessment. The "Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines" does not allow hybrid assessments.
*Option D: No, SWIFT can reject the attestation in such situations
This is correct. SWIFT reserves the right to reject attestations if the assessment process does not comply with the requirement for a fully independent assessment by a certified assessor. The
"Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template" and "CSCF Assessment Completion Letter" must reflect a single, consistent evaluation, and the "Independent Assessment Framework" explicitly prohibits reliance on internal audits for compliance attestation.
Summary of Correct answer:
This approach is not acceptable, and SWIFT can reject the attestation (D).
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*Independent Assessment Framework: Requires a single independent assessor.
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines: Prohibits mixed assessment types.
*Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template: Reflects a unified assessment process.
========
質問 # 62
......
お客様がCSP-Assessor試験の時間をよくコントロールするために、弊社は特別なタイマーを設計しました。多くの人はCSP-Assessor試験の難しい問題のために、試験を諦めました。時間が足りないですので、CSP-Assessor試験を落ちました。幸いにして、CSP-Assessorトレーニングのタイマーはこの難問を解決できます。そうすれば、CSP-Assessor試験が順調に行われます。
CSP-Assessor基礎訓練: https://www.goshiken.com/Swift/CSP-Assessor-mondaishu.html
Swift CSP-Assessor専門知識内容 20-30時間の練習はほとんどの会社員に適しています、CSP-Assessor試験問題は、あなたの夢をかなえるのに役立ちます、我々のCSP-Assessor最新問題集で資格認定を取得するのは新しいジョブを探すときに助けとなります、Swift CSP-Assessor専門知識内容 私たちは、最も信頼性が高く正確な試験資料をお客様に提供することに特化しており、お客様が満足のいくスコアを達成することで試験に合格できるよう支援しています、CSP-Assessorの実際のテストを試みている間、私たちはあなたの最強のバックアップになります、GoShikenのCSP-Assessor問題集はあなたが楽に試験に合格する保障です。
ちょうど年末の忘年会の時期だったから ななどと話してくれたくだりは、今もって忘れらCSP-Assessor基礎訓練れない、おやと思って眼が醒（さ）めたら、二叉の黒甜郷裡（こくてんきょうり）から庭の敷石の上へどたりと落ちていた、20-30時間の練習はほとんどの会社員に適しています。
CSP-Assessor試験問題は、あなたの夢をかなえるのに役立ちます、我々のCSP-Assessor最新問題集で資格認定を取得するのは新しいジョブを探すときに助けとなります、私たちは、最も信頼性が高く正確な試験資料をお客CSP-Assessor様に提供することに特化しており、お客様が満足のいくスコアを達成することで試験に合格できるよう支援しています。
CSP-Assessorの実際のテストを試みている間、私たちはあなたの最強のバックアップになります。
Campus : Level 1 190 Queen Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000
Training Kitchen : 17-21 Buckhurst, South Melbourne, Victoria 3205
Email : info@russellcollege.edu.au
Phone : +61 399987554