Copyright © 2023 Russell College Design By Nubevest.
DOWNLOAD the newest Braindumpsqa JN0-664 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_Rv_Jp4ps7kSr3jfI8Gn1uNJQc_1AxMy
Believe in yourself, choosing the JN0-664 study guide is the wisest decision. So far, the JN0-664 practice materials have almost covered all the official test of useful JN0-664 exam materials, before our products on the Internet, all the JN0-664 study materials are subject to rigorous expert review, so you do not have to worry about quality problems of our latest JN0-664 Exam Torrent, focus on the review pass the JN0-664 qualification exam. I believe that through these careful preparation, you will be able to pass the exam.
Juniper JN0-664 (Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP)) Exam is a professional-level certification for those who aspire to become service provider experts. Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) certification is designed to test the knowledge, skills, and abilities of the candidates in configuring and troubleshooting Junos-based service provider networks. The JN0-664 Exam is designed to validate the skills and knowledge of candidates in the field of service provider networking, including virtualization, troubleshooting, and security.
>> Real JN0-664 Exam Questions <<
Braindumpsqa Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) (JN0-664) Questions have numerous benefits, including the ability to demonstrate to employers and clients that you have the necessary knowledge and skills to succeed in the actual JN0-664 exam. Certified professionals are often more sought after than their non-certified counterparts and are more likely to earn higher salaries and promotions. Moreover, cracking the Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) (JN0-664) exam helps to ensure that you stay up to date with the latest trends and developments in the industry, making you more valuable assets to your organization.
NEW QUESTION # 14
Exhibit
R1 and R8 are not receiving each other's routes
Referring to the exhibit, what are three configuration commands that would solve this problem? (Choose three.)
Answer: A,B,E
Explanation:
The problem in this scenario is that R1 and R8 are not receiving each other's routes because of private AS numbers in the AS path. Private AS numbers are not globally unique and are not advertised to external BGP peers. To solve this problem, you need to do the following:
* Configure loops on routers in AS 65412 and advertise-peer-as on routers in AS 64498. This allows R5 and R6 to advertise their own AS number (65412) instead of their peer's AS number (64498) when sending updates to R7 and R8. This prevents a loop detection issue that would cause R7 and R8 to reject the routes from R5 and R62.
* Configure remove-private on advertisements from AS 64497 toward AS 64498 and from AS 64500
* toward AS 64499. This removes any private AS numbers from the AS path before sending updates to external BGP peers. This allows R2 and R3 to receive the routes from R1 and R4, respectively3.
NEW QUESTION # 15
Exhibit
Based on the configuration contents shown in the exhibit, which statement is true?
Answer: C
Explanation:
This configuration applies to IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) and is designed to control multicast group memberships on the interface ge-0/0/0.0.
Breaking Down the Configuration
1## Policy-Statement: block-igmp
policy-statement block-igmp {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 224.7.7.7/32 exact;
source-address-filter 192.168.100.10/32 exact;
}
then reject;
}
}
* This policy blocks IGMP joins for group 224.7.7.7 only if the source IP is 192.168.100.10.
* If both conditions match, the request is rejected.
2## IGMP Configuration on Interface ge-0/0/0.0
[edit protocols igmp]
user@router# show
interface ge-0/0/0.0 {
group-policy block-igmp;
group-limit 25;
}
* group-policy block-igmp applies the policy statement block-igmp, meaning IGMP join requests are evaluated based on this policy.
* group-limit 25 means the interface allows up to 25 multicast groups.
Evaluating the Answer Choices
# A. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10.
* Correct, because:
* The policy specifically matches group 224.7.7.7 and source IP 192.168.100.10.
* If both conditions are met, the join is rejected.
# B. Joins for any group are accepted if the group count value is less than 25.
* Incorrect, because:
* The group-limit (25) applies to the total number of IGMP groups but does not override explicit policy rules.
* Even if there are fewer than 25 groups, a join request can still be rejected by the policy statement.
# C. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are always rejected, regardless of the group count.
* Incorrect, because:
* The policy only blocks joins from the specific source 192.168.100.10.
* Joins from other sources to 224.7.7.7 are allowed.
# D. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25.
* Incorrect, because:
* Joins for 224.7.7.7 from source 192.168.100.10 will always be rejected, even if the group count is below 25.
* The group-limit does not override the rejection policy.
"Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10."
# Official Juniper Documentation Reference:
# Junos IGMP Policy Configuration Guide
"A group-policy statement allows filtering IGMP joins based on multicast group address and source IP."
NEW QUESTION # 16
Your organization manages a Layer 3 VPN for multiple customers. To support advanced route filtering on your PE routers, you must advertise more than one BGP community on advertised VPN routes to remote PE routers.
Which routing-instance configuration parameter would support this requirement?
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 17
You enabled a new router (R3) in your network but all destinations using IS-IS routes are not properly load balancing over this new router.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 18
Exhibit
A network is using IS-IS for routing.
In this scenario, why are there two TLVs shown in the exhibit?
Answer: C
Explanation:
TLVs are tuples of (Type, Length, Value) that can be advertised in IS-IS packets. TLVs can carry different kinds of information in the Link State Packets (LSPs). IS-IS supports both narrow and wide metrics for link costs. Narrow metrics use a single octet to encode the link cost, while wide metrics use three octets. Narrow metrics have a maximum value of 63, while wide metrics have a maximum value of 16777215. If there are both narrow and wide metric devices in the topology, IS-IS will advertise two TLVs for each link: one with the narrow metric and one with the wide metric. This allows backward compatibility with older devices that only support narrow metrics12.
NEW QUESTION # 19
......
The test software used in our products is a perfect match for Windows' JN0-664 learning material, which enables you to enjoy the best learning style on your computer. Our JN0-664 study materials also use the latest science and technology to meet the new requirements of authoritative research material network learning. Unlike the traditional way of learning, the great benefit of our JN0-664 Study Materials are that when the user finishes the exercise, he can get feedback in the fastest time.
Reliable JN0-664 Test Book: https://www.braindumpsqa.com/JN0-664_braindumps.html
BONUS!!! Download part of Braindumpsqa JN0-664 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_Rv_Jp4ps7kSr3jfI8Gn1uNJQc_1AxMy
Campus : Level 1 190 Queen Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000
Training Kitchen : 17-21 Buckhurst, South Melbourne, Victoria 3205
Email : info@russellcollege.edu.au
Phone : +61 399987554