2025 Latest Real4Prep KCSA PDF Dumps and KCSA Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1g6D4xh52TTOM4SThMpibhM69yeDazQrc
As far as the top features of Real4Prep KCSA exam questions formats are concerned, the Linux Foundation KCSA desktop practice test software and web-based practice test software both are customizable and track your performance. These KCSA practice tests are specifically designed to give you a real-time KCSA Exam environment for preparation. You can trust both KCSA practice test software and start preparing today. The desktop software runs on Windows computers. The web-based KCSA practice exam is supported by all browsers and operating systems.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
As we all know, it is a must for all of the candidates to pass the exam if they want to get the related KCSA certification which serves as the best evidence for them to show their knowledge and skills. If you want to simplify the preparation process, here comes a piece of good news for you. Our KCSA Exam Question has been widely praised by all of our customers in many countries and our company has become the leader in this field. Now I would like to give you some detailed information about the advantages of our KCSA guide torrent.
NEW QUESTION # 38
Which of the following statements on static Pods is true?
Answer: B
Explanation:
* Static Podsare managed directly by thekubeleton each node.
* They arenot scheduled by the kube-schedulerand always remain bound to the node where they are defined.
* Exact extract (Kubernetes Docs - Static Pods):
* "Static Pods are managed directly by the kubelet daemon on a specific node, without the API server. They do not go through the Kubernetes scheduler."
* Clarifications:
* A: Static Pods do not span multiple nodes.
* B: No hard limit of 5 Pods per node.
* D: They are not a fallback mechanism; kubelet always manages them regardless of scheduler state.
References:
Kubernetes Docs - Static Pods: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/static-pod/
NEW QUESTION # 39
A container image istrojanizedby an attacker by compromising the build server. Based on the STRIDE threat modeling framework, which threat category best defines this threat?
Answer: A
Explanation:
* In STRIDE,Tamperingis the threat category forunauthorized modification of data or code/artifacts. A trojanized container image is, by definition, an attacker'smodificationof the build output (the image) after compromising the CI/build system-i.e., tampering with the artifact in the software supply chain.
* Why not the others?
* Spoofingis about identity/authentication (e.g., pretending to be someone/something).
* Repudiationis about denying having performed an action without sufficient audit evidence.
* Denial of Servicetargets availability (exhausting resources or making a service unavailable).The scenario explicitly focuses on analtered imageresulting from a compromised build server-this squarely maps toTampering.
Authoritative references (for verification and deeper reading):
* Kubernetes (official docs)- Supply Chain Security (discusses risks such as compromised CI/CD pipelines leading to modified/poisoned images and emphasizes verifying image integrity/signatures).
* Kubernetes Docs#Security#Supply chain securityandSecuring a cluster(sections on image provenance, signing, and verifying artifacts).
* CNCF TAG Security - Cloud Native Security Whitepaper (v2)- Threat modeling in cloud-native and software supply chain risks; describes attackers modifying build outputs (images/artifacts) via CI
/CD compromise as a form oftamperingand prescribes controls (signing, provenance, policy).
* CNCF TAG Security - Software Supply Chain Security Best Practices- Explicitly covers CI/CD compromise leading tomaliciously modified imagesand recommends SLSA, provenance attestation, and signature verification (policy enforcement via admission controls).
* Microsoft STRIDE (canonical reference)- DefinesTamperingasmodifying data or code, which directly fits a trojanized image produced by a compromised build system.
NEW QUESTION # 40
What mechanism can I use to block unsigned images from running in my cluster?
Answer: B
Explanation:
* KubernetesAdmission Controllers(particularlyValidatingAdmissionWebhooks) can be used to enforce policies that validate image signatures.
* This is commonly implemented withtools like Sigstore/cosign, Kyverno, or OPA Gatekeeper.
* PodSecurityPolicy (PSP):deprecated and never supported image signature validation.
* Pod Security Standards (PSS):only apply to pod security fields (privilege, users, host access), not image signatures.
* CRI:while runtimes (containerd, CRI-O) may integrate with signature verification tools, enforcement in Kubernetes is generally done viaAdmission Controllersat the API layer.
Exact extract (Admission Controllers docs):
* "Admission webhooks can be used to enforce custom policies on the objects being admitted." (e.g., validating signatures).
References:
Kubernetes Docs - Admission Controllers: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz
/admission-controllers/
Sigstore Project (cosign): https://sigstore.dev/
Kyverno ImageVerify Policy: https://kyverno.io/policies/pod-security/require-image-verification/
NEW QUESTION # 41
What is the purpose of the Supplier Assessments and Reviews control in the NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 set of controls for Supply Chain Risk Management?
Answer: A
Explanation:
* In NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5,SR-6: Supplier Assessments and Reviewsrequires evaluating and monitoring suppliers' security and risk practices.
* Exact extract (NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, SR-6):
* "The organization assesses and monitors suppliers to ensure they are meeting the security requirements specified in contracts and agreements."
* This is aboutongoing monitoringof supplier adherence, not financial audits, not contract creation, and not supplier discovery.
References:
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control SR-6 (Supplier Assessments and Reviews): https://csrc.nist.gov/publications
/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final
NEW QUESTION # 42
When using a cloud provider's managed Kubernetes service, who is responsible for maintaining the etcd cluster?
Answer: C
Explanation:
* Inmanaged Kubernetes services(EKS, GKE, AKS), the control plane is operated by thecloud provider
.
* This includesetcd, API server, controller manager, scheduler.
* Users manageworker nodes(in some models) and workloads, but not the control plane.
* Exact extract (GKE Docs):
* "The control plane, including the API server and etcd database, is managed and maintained by Google."
* Similarly forEKSandAKS, etcd is fully managed by the provider.
References:
GKE Architecture: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cluster-architecture EKS Architecture: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/eks/latest/userguide/eks-architecture.html AKS Docs: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/concepts-clusters-workloads
NEW QUESTION # 43
......
The Linux Foundation KCSA certification exam is a valuable asset for beginners and seasonal professionals. If you want to improve your career prospects then KCSA certification is a step in the right direction. Whether you’re just starting your career or looking to advance your career, the KCSA Certification Exam is the right choice. With the KCSA certification you can gain a range of career benefits which include credibility, marketability, validation of skills, and access to new job opportunities.
KCSA New Dumps Book: https://www.real4prep.com/KCSA-exam.html
2025 Latest Real4Prep KCSA PDF Dumps and KCSA Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1g6D4xh52TTOM4SThMpibhM69yeDazQrc
Campus : Level 1 190 Queen Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000
Training Kitchen : 17-21 Buckhurst, South Melbourne, Victoria 3205
Email : info@russellcollege.edu.au
Phone : +61 399987554